Home of the Muppet Imperial Moderator Corps

virtual sex with a virtual underage partner

http://www.thelistener.co.nz/issue/3462/columnists/7007/get_real.html;jsessionid=360A10420468B5F9065B036D88EA7B03



not a crime in my book.  in fact, not even a problem.

no one was harmed, no damage was done.
Permalink [wSV] 
September 14th, 2006 10:17pm
I'm worried about when the vorephiles start turning into giants...
Permalink Send private email Steel McLargeEsquimaux 
September 14th, 2006 10:46pm
huh?
Permalink [wSV] 
September 14th, 2006 10:48pm
The argument against any underage porn that doesn't really involve children (virtual sex, morphed images, etc) is "it'll just feed the latent urges until they want it for real"

Total BS.
Permalink Send private email Steel McLargeEsquimaux 
September 14th, 2006 11:18pm
Is it like manslaughter? Intent counts. The person didn't intend to have virtual sex with an underage partner so they are less guilty if the person turns out to be underage?
Permalink son of parnas 
September 15th, 2006 12:22am
well, if you cant be bothered reading the article...


you have to be over 18 to sign up, they check for that.  once some people are in, they create avatars that _appear_ to be underage, and they then get propositioned by others...to the point of having people request sexual bondage type activities.

so, both parties are _overage_ for the purposes of this conversation, they have just agreed to play dressup.
Permalink worldsSmallestViolin 
September 15th, 2006 12:30am
Next thing you know, certain types of Halloween costumes will become illegal.
Permalink Send private email Aaron F Stanton 
September 15th, 2006 12:34am
Make it 16.
Permalink Send private email Rick Zeng/Tseng 
September 15th, 2006 12:38am
No, it has to be 18 in the US for certain content.
Permalink Send private email Aaron F Stanton 
September 15th, 2006 12:38am
"so, both parties are _overage_ for the purposes of this conversation, they have just agreed to play dressup."

Ah.

See, what you *don't* know is that our Congress passed a law making it kiddie porn if the person in the photo *appears* under 18, no matter what their actual age is. The law was found unconstitutional, and I think the case involved a *drawing* of a girl portrayed as a minor.

Totally victimless crime. The logic was that people who look at even fake images of kiddies will at some point go after real kiddies.
Permalink Send private email Steel McLargeEsquimaux 
September 15th, 2006 1:39am
"if the person in the photo *appears* under 18, no matter what their actual age is."

oh, good.  have they get around to writing out a well-defined standard for the definition of 'appears' yet?  or are they doing a marktaw?
Permalink worldsSmallestViolin 
September 15th, 2006 1:53am
"The argument against any underage porn that doesn't really involve children (virtual sex, morphed images, etc) is "it'll just feed the latent urges until they want it for real"

Total BS."

Really?  So after watching a ton of lesbian porn, you don't want any sex?
Permalink Send private email wicket awethome 
September 15th, 2006 7:37am
...not with lesbians I dont...
Permalink worldsSmallestViolin 
September 15th, 2006 7:37am
I'm sorry wSV in your case please substitute "barn porn".
Permalink Send private email wicket awethome 
September 15th, 2006 7:38am
heyyyyy....I dont _enjoy_ shagging sheep.  I only do it to keep my father in law happy.  the old goat is sheep mad.
Permalink worldsSmallestViolin 
September 15th, 2006 7:43am
(what do you think I am???? some kind of pervert?)
Permalink worldsSmallestViolin 
September 15th, 2006 7:44am
Yes, but that's beside the point.

I mean, that's not perverted where you come from.  Shagging women is, which is why you're a pervert.
Permalink Send private email Aaron F Stanton 
September 15th, 2006 7:48am
hey! I dont shag women! prick.
Permalink worldsSmallestViolin 
September 15th, 2006 7:49am
(wondering now what the interspecies variant his kids are...)
Permalink Send private email Aaron F Stanton 
September 15th, 2006 7:51am
lets just say I hand feed them.
Permalink worldsSmallestViolin 
September 15th, 2006 7:57am

This topic is archived. No further replies will be accepted.

Other topics: September, 2006 Other topics: September, 2006 Recent topics Recent topics