Y'all are a bunch of wankers!

Wikipedia too liberal?

There was an item on Radion 4 (uk) today where some right wing, conservative, religious nut was moaning about wikipedia being to liberal and anti-religious!
Permalink Billx 
March 7th, 2007 7:02pm
Sure is. That's why God invented ...

Permalink Send private email strawberry snowflake 
March 7th, 2007 7:04pm
No concern for truth or accuracy. He just wants to get the spin right. Argh.
Permalink son of parnas 
March 7th, 2007 7:05pm
Yeah, yeah, that's what they ALWAYS say, to then justify their ultra-conservative looney-tune 'correction' activity. 

Like the Supreme Court is too liberal, so let's appoint a lady from Texas who's WAY against Roe v. Wade.

Like all the courts are too liberal (Damn activist judges!) so let's appoint and re-re-re-appoint all those most conservative judges, who've been turned down by the congress three times already!

Mark my words, there'll be postings by Newt Gingrich next!
Permalink SaveTheHubble 
March 7th, 2007 7:05pm
Yes he was promoting this new site. He complained that wikipedia suffered from 'mob rule' so the wikipedia guy pointed out that they were using the same software and would therefore suffer from the same thing.
Permalink Billx 
March 7th, 2007 7:06pm
It's funny how 'no point of view' or 'facts' seems to translate in a conservative mind into 'liberal bias' or 'gay'.
Permalink Colm 
March 7th, 2007 8:36pm
For those who find Wikipedia too conservative, the was once work on http://zpedia.org/ by Aaron "abandonware" Schwartz.  I guess the z pays homage to http://zmag.org/ .
Permalink bob 
March 7th, 2007 8:39pm
"Wikipedia allows the use of B.C.E. instead of B.C. and C.E. instead of A.D. The dates are based on the birth of Jesus, so why pretend otherwise? Conservapedia is Christian-friendly and exposes the CE deception."

OH NOES!!!  The dreaded CE deception!  Will the madness never stop?  DAMN YOU WIKIPEEEEEEEEDIAAAAAAAAA!
Permalink John Haren 
March 8th, 2007 12:57am
in HG Wells The Time Machine, travel into the future founda world where the human race had divided into the fey-workers, who are both served and preyed upon by the undergorund worker trolls.

A revised version might see those two groups replaced with those who had completely forsaken rationalism for superstition, yet hold much material power, and ... the ones who didn't.
Permalink $-- 
March 8th, 2007 4:17am
Yeah, if you assume Wikipedia "works" all they're actually moaning about is that the (techno-literate) population is more liberal and secular than they would like.. but they really don't like that reality so they feel more comfortable blaming the technology in some way.
March 8th, 2007 7:36am
I suspect that people who seek fact and truth will always be more effective than people who don't.

Even if the motivation for the people who don't is that current 'fact' and current 'truth' seem to contradict their understanding of their religion.

The problem with denying some input that seems to contradict your religious understanding is that your religious understanding could NEED some correction.

Another idea -- seeking fact and truth is the only way to prevent "group think" from making your society static, brittle, and ultimately evil.
March 8th, 2007 9:45am
Main stream media has been moving steadily "rightwards" for the last decade and half. What would have been frothing wingnut ravings (such as savage, coultergeist and limbaug) 15 years ago is now considered "normal" and "mainstream." Anything that isn't moving as fast to the nazi side of the house is obviously perceived as "lefty" and "liberal" and should be murdered according to coulter and limbaugh.
Permalink Peter 
March 8th, 2007 9:47am
Yes, and it's that "rightward movement" that got us the group-think that supported the Iraq war, huge budget deficits, and the deregulation that's got us Enron and the California Energy Crisis.  And $2.50 a gallon gasoline.

I think the pendulum is starting to swing back, as the crows from that group-think are starting to come home to roost.  But it's certainly still out there.
Permalink SaveTheHubble 
March 8th, 2007 10:00am
Don't forget the rightward drift also correlated to Wikipedia and Google as well. Over the last 6-7 years say.
Permalink can't say that on this forum 
March 8th, 2007 10:04am
Dedication to the truth, that's the only way to detect 'drifts', and decide if/when to correct them.

Which is why this "liberal"/"conservative" labelling is not very helpful.  Either side can be blinded by their bias (though I do think a liberal "bias" is less likely to be "blinded" by sticking to orthodoxy.  The very idea of a "liberal orthodoxy" being a bit of an oxymoron).
Permalink SaveTheHubble 
March 8th, 2007 10:11am
People who say 'faggot' should go into rehab?
Permalink can't say that on this forum 
March 8th, 2007 10:12am
Well, people who say it and mean it.
Permalink Send private email Flasher T 
March 8th, 2007 10:23am
If they've graduated from High School, then yes.
Permalink SaveTheHubble 
March 8th, 2007 10:36am

This topic is archived. No further replies will be accepted.

Other topics: March, 2007 Other topics: March, 2007 Recent topics Recent topics