I'm just not feelin' it, guys
Where have all the panty-waists gone? Is there noone left on CoT with silly and easily offended sensibilities?
March 8th, 2007 10:18am
No. But thanks for your input.
March 8th, 2007 10:22am
That's what I'm talking about. They've all gone to Blah. Blah has become a safe haven for easily excitable nincompoops who just can't handle inflammatory influence in their lives.
How boring. The sheep have locked themselves away from the wolves. How will anyone be entertained this way? The sheep will bleat away happily and the wolves can spar with each other but ultimately no one benefits. It's tragic.
March 8th, 2007 10:28am
Not to be difficult, but it wasn't the sheep that requested that the wolf remove all of his posts. The wolf requested that himself.
There's something odd going on here, that isn't accurately reflected in your comments. It seems like you're trying to characterize the Blah population as "sheep", and then use that characterization to criticize them for your own actions.
Meanwhile, you characterize yourself as a "wolf", to fit the metaphor. Again, while that may make your feel better about yourself, I don't think it fits the situation.
"Whiny asshole flounces off in a huff, since his audience objected too strongly and in the wrong way to his abuse" seems much closer to the mark. You and Michael Richards should get together and discuss life over drinks.
According to the wolf, words have only the effect one allows them to have.
Obviously a banner of 'AW' had only the effect the wolf would allow.
"Whiny asshole flounces off in a huff, after capricious moderator decides to alter the the contents of every historical post ever made by whiny asshole."
Let's try that with your posts, Allan. I'm sure you won't mind having the context of everything you've ever said radically altered. Shouldn't bother you a bit.
Anyway, yes, the whole incident was a particularly loud "BLEAT" from a particularly nervous herd of sheep.
March 8th, 2007 12:06pm
It appears one-line asshole Flasher has followed you back to CoT. This is not a welcome development.
It's worse than before. Prior to now, his one-liners were at least sort of in context.
March 8th, 2007 1:04pm
> I'm sure you won't mind having the context of everything you've ever said radically altered.
Calling you an "attention whore" hardly alters any context.
March 8th, 2007 4:28pm
?? it obviously does mark. maybe not to you, youve labelled muppet in your own head and put him nicely inside a box, but clearly it affects the context of those reading it who have had no previous experience with muppet.
amazing though this may seem to you, not everyone sees muppet in the same way you do.
hey, if adding subjective opinions about the poster to every post makes absolutely no difference to its context, why dont you add them to every blah poster? I have a few suggestions.....
ohhhh! how about "drug trash"? you could add that to, say, well....why dont you figure it out....
You say that as if my subjective opinion wasn't the only one that mattered.
March 8th, 2007 7:31pm
<shrug> clearly it is when you have control of the forum. thats why you were able to do it.
did you enjoy humiliating muppet like that? did you like the taste of power?
do you get a funny feeling in your tummy when you think about it?
hey, Ive got another idea if he still has an account. why dont you put 'im a giant poo poo head' as an auto signature for him?
Meh, he hasn't posted since then. It's almost like he has some sort of issue with the place.
March 8th, 2007 8:41pm