http://americablog.blogspot.com/2007/03/94-to-2-vote-shows-how-radioactive.html
interesting. its not just the democrats though, as this ignorant jackass of a blogger seems to think. a good chunk of the senate is republican and _they_ bitchslapped him as well.
poor bush is going to have a hard 2 years I think*
* fuck bush
Daddy's Irony House
iFAQ
I will do bananas.
Asteroids
Deleted Posts Today (∞)
WinRAR even has codebook entries for redheads jerking off elephants
Senate bitchslaps bush
worldsSmallestViolin March 21st, 2007 12:47am
Apparently it's now "show trials". I hadn't realised Rove and Miers have been locked-up in Guantanamo for four years.
el March 21st, 2007 5:20am
el March 21st, 2007 5:20am
great news. 94-2 ... that means the GOP is maybe waking up.
$-- March 21st, 2007 7:21am
> the GOP is maybe waking up
They are only searching for another dark emperor to justify their giving into their dark side. It's simply bush's incompetence they dislike, not what he stands for.
They are only searching for another dark emperor to justify their giving into their dark side. It's simply bush's incompetence they dislike, not what he stands for.
son of parnas March 21st, 2007 8:58am
It's fascinating how transparent the Bush neo-con phraseology propaganda machine has become.
Now it's "Witch-hunts", "Show-trials", and always "Partisan politics". When instead, it's a Congressional attempt to get straight answers, while the Bush administration says:
"Sure, we'll give you straight answers. Just not under oath, and without a record being kept. These are "honorable men" you're trying to put on a show-trial."
As the Scooter Libby trial showed, Bush administration answers UNDER oath and WITH a record show quite a difference between reality and what was said. WITHOUT an oath and WITHOUT a record, it becomes very unlikely that the "straight answers" will be true.
Now it's "Witch-hunts", "Show-trials", and always "Partisan politics". When instead, it's a Congressional attempt to get straight answers, while the Bush administration says:
"Sure, we'll give you straight answers. Just not under oath, and without a record being kept. These are "honorable men" you're trying to put on a show-trial."
As the Scooter Libby trial showed, Bush administration answers UNDER oath and WITH a record show quite a difference between reality and what was said. WITHOUT an oath and WITHOUT a record, it becomes very unlikely that the "straight answers" will be true.
SaveTheHubble March 21st, 2007 9:39am
But, but - if they don't have anything to hide, they shouldn't have a problem testifying under oath.
I think the Senate should just send a note to Bush:
Mr. President, we have watched and learned from your leadership these past six years, and you have impressed us with your fortitude and dedication to obtaining the truth. In light of our experience and education, we would like to offer your staff an option worthy of your leadership: they can either come to the Capitol and testify under oath, or we can come there and waterboard them and strap electrodes to their genitals. While we understand the latter course is more likely to provide more veracity, in the interest of expedience we're willing to settle for the former.
Love,
Congress
I think the Senate should just send a note to Bush:
Mr. President, we have watched and learned from your leadership these past six years, and you have impressed us with your fortitude and dedication to obtaining the truth. In light of our experience and education, we would like to offer your staff an option worthy of your leadership: they can either come to the Capitol and testify under oath, or we can come there and waterboard them and strap electrodes to their genitals. While we understand the latter course is more likely to provide more veracity, in the interest of expedience we're willing to settle for the former.
Love,
Congress
"more veracity"
hehehe
hehehe
This topic is archived. No further replies will be accepted.
Other topics: March, 2007
Recent topics