Convincing argument against evolution
Evolution doesn't state how life began, only how it evolved since then. They're not arguing against "evolution" at all.
But when you put peanut butter & jelly together. Watch out!
It's a bit akin to the nonsense I heard Phil Valentine spouting the other day.
He kept talking about how people were carbon based and how trees were carbon based, and sarcastically that all that carbon was so bad and evil. Maybe he's an idiot, or maybe he just figures it's better for ratings if he ignores the fact that C != CO2.
no, this is far more convincing: http://www.carrottop.com/
"Spontaneous generation of Life in a jar of peanut butter". Well, if God is sovereign, why not? And if God IS sovereign, why hasn't he?
And if you leave that lid off for a few days, Life WILL grow in that jar of Peanut Butter -- the video explains that as "corruption from somewhere else" -- but that's LIFE man!
If God chose to create life, and use evolution to evolve life to get to us, who are you to say no to that? And just because Moses didn't write about Evolution in Genesis, who are you to say it hasn't happened?
I think you missed the lesson in Genesis. Which is that God made everything. The lesson in Genesis was not supposed to be a scientific straight-jacket to Man that he had to deny fact and reason and accept a fable on faith. The lesson was about God's relationship to the world and Man.
For the Creationists to ignore the actual Bible in favor of their ignorant and legalistic intepretation of it is tragic.