Reconciling assholes for nearly a decade.

seems Im fully permissive

http://www.philosophersnet.com/games/taboo.htm

There was stuff there that I would term 'gross','yucky' or 'disgusting' but nothing particularly immoral IMO.
Permalink Send private email zestyZucchini 
April 4th, 2007 7:49pm
"In one country, it is normal for people to have secret sex with dead chickens."

HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAA
Permalink Send private email muppet 
April 4th, 2007 7:54pm
interestingly enough, I think I would find eating the semen stuffed chicken more disgusting that fucking my sister.


if given the choice I would have to think on it...
Permalink Send private email zestyZucchini 
April 4th, 2007 7:58pm
Your Moralising Quotient is: 0.00.

Your Interference Factor is: 0.00.

Your Universalising Factor is: -1.
Permalink Send private email sharkfish 
April 4th, 2007 10:04pm
If you want to have sex with dead chickens, that is fine with me. 


Just don't ask me to eat at your house.
Permalink Send private email sharkfish 
April 4th, 2007 10:05pm
Your Moralising Quotient is: 0.17.

Your Interference Factor is: 0.00.

Your Universalising Factor is: 0.00.


Compared to eye-socket necrophilia, all their scenarios are pretty tame.
Permalink Send private email Ward 
April 4th, 2007 10:39pm
Ward, you demented pervert! The Lord will smite you!
Permalink Bubba 
April 4th, 2007 11:49pm
why didn\'t you get zero Ward?  which one did you balk at? the brother and sister?


pretty easy questions.  how about \"can parents refuse medical care for their children?\"
Permalink bob 
April 5th, 2007 12:02am
I think I posted the other day that having damage to one's ventrimedial something or other causes one to moralize like a philosopher.

These people and their frozen chickens are fucked up.
Permalink Send private email strawberry snowflake 
April 5th, 2007 12:46am
That was the most boring questionnaire ever. "Is this bad?" "Is this bad?" over and over again. ZZzzzz. Who gives a crap?
Permalink Send private email Сергей РахманиноB 
April 5th, 2007 2:09am
I failed to see how the questions had anything to do with moral(s). I guess it depends on your definition of the word. Mine is "rule of thumb".
Permalink ipmal 
April 5th, 2007 8:15am
Yup, 0, 0, -1.  Fully permissive.

Surprising, considering I'm a moderate Christian.

But in all fairness, all of their scenarios are pretty tame, except for the brother-sister one.  Except for that one, they involve only one person, they don't involve killing or abusing another person.

So their test basically isn't a morality test.  Instead it's a "how high does the yuk factor have to be before you start pretending it's a moral issue" test.

So it's a bit morally wrong for them to pretend that it IS a morality test.  I guess I'm not fully permissive after all.
Permalink SaveTheHubble 
April 5th, 2007 8:59am
same. permissive - 0.12, 0.00 on the others.
Permalink $-- 
April 5th, 2007 9:48am
Your Moralising Quotient is: 0.33.

Your Interference Factor is: 0.75.

Your Universalising Factor is: 0.00.
Permalink Send private email Kenny 
April 5th, 2007 10:38am

This topic is archived. No further replies will be accepted.

Other topics: April, 2007 Other topics: April, 2007 Recent topics Recent topics