Affirmative Action for Gays
I'm so tired of being discriminated against because I am gay. We need affirmative action. Each company needs to be required to hire 15% gays since gays are 15% of the population. Likewise for university admissions. It's the only way to right the wrongs that have been done.
Ian Grievances
April 13th, 2007 8:27pm
"Each company needs to be required to hire 15% gays since gays are 15% of the population."
Sure, if you can show us that.
University admission is a different stories though. Why do you need help? You guys/gals are much cleverer than many of us.
Rick Zeng/Tseng
April 13th, 2007 8:35pm
I thought gays were 10% of the population.
Have you gay folks been reproducing asexually, or what?
Full name
April 13th, 2007 8:42pm
>You guys/gals are much cleverer than many of us.
Is not that, is just that chinese are dumber than everyone else :)
Oh snap, Masiosare! Oh no you didn't!
Jon
April 13th, 2007 9:54pm
I think each company should hire 5% trolls.
strawberry snowflake
April 13th, 2007 9:56pm
Actually the 10% figure is based on Prison and Military samples and is generally recognised to be too high. A recent more random sample in the UK got a figure of 3%.
Billx
April 14th, 2007 4:08am
How do you prove gayness?
If it meant getting a higher paying job, plenty of people would check the "gay" box.
Duff
April 14th, 2007 9:34am
1. It's funny, but I can't remember the last time we had gay slaves in America.
2. As far as I know, gays are over-represented in the wealthy and cultured areas (and arts, and actors). Thus they don't NEED affirmative action, they're already there.
SaveTheHubble
April 14th, 2007 1:34pm
Gays pay too much for schools and such as they have kids at 1:7 rates. Gays and other people who don't have kids should get a tax deduction (the check box would be right next to the one for dependents).
strawberry snowflake
April 14th, 2007 2:50pm
So maybe pacifists should get a tax rebate from defence spending?
Billx
April 14th, 2007 3:03pm
Because their not signing up means the government has to spend more on private defense contractors/mercenaries? That doesn't follow. The pacifists cost the government money, so they should pay an additional tax.
Practical Economist
April 14th, 2007 8:10pm