Hmm, thought; elite bloggers are poor, modern-day socialites
Ahole thought of the day. I was thinking about all those hip bloggers from SF. Just a bunch of socialites with nothing to do.
Bot Berlin
April 16th, 2007 1:35am
Very interesting comparison. I can see many parallels. Thanks.
Practical Economist
April 16th, 2007 1:41am
so what does that make people that read all that stuff?
the same maybe.
$--
April 16th, 2007 6:57am
And you are just unhip with nothing else to do.
Face it, in the modern world people don't have anything to do. It's all made up.
son of parnas
April 16th, 2007 9:51am
>Just a bunch of socialites with nothing to do.
The fact that twitter is viewed as a good evolution of online activity by anyone is a very, very bad sign.
People burn out of this stuff. Already the original intent of a blog has largely dissolved, and only a few actually use it in that Twitter Sr. manner. Now it's just a publishing medium.
DF
April 16th, 2007 10:28am
Blogs always failed at interactivity, which is the heart of communication. That's what Twitter offers. It's not about depth.
son of parnas
April 16th, 2007 10:31am
Right, because we really need to know when a friend has just had a great bowel movement. :-P
Full name
April 16th, 2007 1:42pm
That's what CoT is for.
Colm
April 16th, 2007 1:44pm
There are socialites in modern times (w/o blogs). Jemina Khan is called a socialite.
blahty heartsheep
April 16th, 2007 1:49pm
I don't think he was saying they've replaced the old guard, they just represent that sort of culture.
People sitting around gossiping about the others, and they get together in restaurants and gab, then run back home to tell the others the latest.
Practical Economist
April 16th, 2007 2:38pm
And who the heck doesn't do that? Isn't something like 30% of conversation gossip and stories? That being a good thing.
blahty heartsheep
April 16th, 2007 3:17pm