8, 8 days until Disney! Ah ha ha!

who do you want more

The one who has sex with you whenever you want it.

Or...

The one who has sex with you sometimes, unpredictably.
Permalink Send private email sharkfish 
April 26th, 2007 8:52pm
# 1
Permalink AMerrickanGirl 
April 26th, 2007 8:53pm
Careful...

which sex is better?
Permalink  
April 26th, 2007 8:57pm
Hehe, reddit  junkie
Permalink Bot Berlin 
April 26th, 2007 8:57pm
Depends a lot on the person you're having it with, no matter whetber you can predict whether sex will happen or not.  You can have an unpredictable lousy lover, or vice versa.
Permalink AMerrickanGirl 
April 26th, 2007 8:58pm
the sex is equally good.

...
THe guys at work say only women want someone who isn't available.  Men just want sex.  I believe the phrase describing the phenomena is "Women want the hunt, men enjoy eating the kill."

And then I said "but in my experience..." and then they proceeded to invalidate everything I said after that.  Since I am female, somehow that makes me incapable of understanding the value of regular, predictable ejaculation.
Permalink Send private email sharkfish 
April 26th, 2007 9:07pm
Just answer the question don't ruin the fun!

Number 2
Permalink what are you reading for? 
April 26th, 2007 9:12pm
"Men want what they can't have," while seeming to defy all observed logic, goes to explain a LOT of wars, bloodshed, and other aberrant behavior recorded through history.

Of course, I had a problem with the article about the rat study - it didn't mention if the rats willing to have sex all the time were fatties.
Permalink Send private email Philo 
April 26th, 2007 9:46pm
Did they base this rat study on many sets of rats, or just one rat threesome?  Because maybe the male rat just happened to be more attracted to the more remote female by happenstance.  Maybe she had bigger teats, or something.
Permalink AMerrickanGirl 
April 26th, 2007 10:01pm
I've been in this situation, so I understand the rat.  You know that feeling you get when you're in a brand new relationship?  The raw passion of it?  It's that sort of thing can be sustained by #2.  It's not that the sex is better, but the passion is more intense.
Permalink Send private email Wayne 
April 26th, 2007 10:23pm
Those sorts of questions are never qualified enough to answer.

The 500 lb bald woman with BO, smelly armpits, and scabs and fungus in the skin folds who has sex with you whenever you want it.

Or...

Salma Hacyk, who has sex with you sometimes, unpredictably.
Permalink Practical Economist 
April 26th, 2007 11:28pm
Variable uneven response is a big part of control. So you'll probably want #2.
Permalink son of parnas 
April 27th, 2007 12:38am
"Since I am female, somehow that makes me incapable of understanding the value of regular, predictable ejaculation."


....and???
Permalink Send private email muppet 
April 27th, 2007 7:14am
Research indicates that regular ejaculation reduces prostate cancer
Permalink Billx 
April 27th, 2007 7:51am
...do I'm only doing it for the benefit of my health
Permalink Billx 
April 27th, 2007 7:52am
The one who knows what she is doing.

Too long I have suffered at the hands of inexperienced women.
Permalink Send private email Tapiwa 
April 27th, 2007 8:52am
right now, either ...
Permalink $-- 
April 27th, 2007 9:27am
Which one will you be happier with?  #1.

Which one will you "want" more?  #2.

There's nothing like unpredictable periodic satisfaction to activate that "crazy desire" gene.

But living with your "crazy desire" gene activated is not fun 90% of the time.  The other 10% is incredible, yes, but not worth the chaos the rest of the time.

Which one will you get tired of all the BS first?  #2.
Permalink SaveTheHubble 
April 27th, 2007 10:32am
Sounds like a reason to have a wife a multiple mistresses. The wife for #1 and them mistresses for #2
Permalink Billx 
April 27th, 2007 10:55am
True, but sadly that situation can be very unstable.  What if one of the mistresses has a child?  What if one of the mistresses wants to be #1?
Permalink SaveTheHubble 
April 27th, 2007 11:28am
> Which one will you be happier with?  #1.
> Which one will you "want" more?  #2.

Nice distinction.
Permalink son of parnas 
April 27th, 2007 12:47pm

This topic is archived. No further replies will be accepted.

Other topics: April, 2007 Other topics: April, 2007 Recent topics Recent topics