Sanding our assholes with 150 grit. Slowly. Lovingly.

Madam to release client list

...on her website

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2007/07/09/alleged-dc-madam-to-to-re_n_55488.html

oh please oh please oh please

Oh PLEASE let this be as entertaining as it promises to be.
Permalink Send private email Philo 
July 9th, 2007 9:53pm
prediction:  she will have been paid a fortune to remove a bunch of names.  hence the sudden loss of interest in using legal means to stop her.

there will be a few names of sufficient apparent importance to warrant a bit of gossip, but nothing earthshaking.
Permalink Send private email zestyZucchini 
July 9th, 2007 9:56pm
in other news, Jane magazine is Kaput.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2007/07/09/jane-magazine-is-kaput_n_55431.html
Permalink Jane Galt 
July 9th, 2007 9:59pm
Please release the hookers list as well. With biography. They must be pretty.
Permalink Yogi Bear 
July 9th, 2007 10:01pm
They're up.  They're TIF files.  She probably scanned her phone bills (haven't viewed them yet).

Sounds much harder to doctor if they are.
Permalink Michael B 
July 9th, 2007 10:05pm
link?  Im gonna download a copy before her servers melt.
Permalink Send private email zestyZucchini 
July 9th, 2007 10:12pm
First Google hit:

California Maritime Academy
200 Maritime Academy Drive
Vallejo, California 94590
Dr. William B. Eisenhardt, President
707-648-1000

Appears on her ATT January 2001 -> December 2001 statements
Permalink Michael B 
July 9th, 2007 10:17pm
Why are you posting that guys personal information on CoT?

http://www.unconfirmedsources.com/?itemid=2635

Bush Pardons DC Madam before Phone Records Released
Permalink Jane Galt 
July 9th, 2007 10:21pm
The phone bill list is public.  The page with his phone number on it is public.  Here's another one that's public.

2001/02/09  202-544-1019

Google Phonebook match

Matthew W Caspari
(202) 544-1019
1705 C St SE,  Washington, DC 20003

Assuming he had that number in 2001, it looks like Assistant D.C. Attorney General Matthew Caspari got a sexy phone call that day.
Permalink Michael B 
July 9th, 2007 10:25pm
website is down. hmm.
Permalink Bot Berlin 
July 9th, 2007 10:25pm
Here's where you can get them

http://www.deborahjeanepalfrey.com/Jeane10c.html
Permalink Michael B 
July 9th, 2007 10:26pm
heh.  site is melted down.

ah well, Ill just wait patiently for the reddit update.
Permalink Send private email zestyZucchini 
July 9th, 2007 10:28pm
Keep hitting refresh. It serves every 5 or so requests.
Permalink DF 
July 9th, 2007 10:30pm
got it.  downloading them now.


holy shit, what a heap.
Permalink Send private email zestyZucchini 
July 9th, 2007 10:31pm
OK I think it's about time to stop and let someone else uncover more names.
Permalink Michael B 
July 9th, 2007 10:32pm
How would you uncover them? I bet a news organizations has a bill interns querying all of the numbers.
Permalink Bot Berlin 
July 9th, 2007 10:33pm
s/bill/billion/g
Permalink Bot Berlin 
July 9th, 2007 10:33pm
Googling phone numbers is for amateurs.

I'm sure the news organizations have access to proprietary databases that let you query even cell phone numbers for names.
Permalink Michael B 
July 9th, 2007 10:37pm
I'd like to take the time to mention that the names pasted above don't prove anything.

The calls happened in 2001 and these Google searches were run in 2007.  The number could have changed hands a dozen times  in the interim.

And as we all know holder of the account does not mean person who received the phone call.

Furthermore, it's possible the DC Madam also called these people completely unsolicited.

It'll take real investigative work to prove any illicit behavior at all.  Lets all count on the media to step up.
Permalink Michael B 
July 9th, 2007 10:45pm
Just because it's public doesn't make it right.  You're playing Dan Denman, but with real people's real names. 

They don't want their real names showing up in this thread anymore than the rest of us do.
Permalink Jane Galt 
July 9th, 2007 10:53pm
Dawn, what are the chances, I downloaded a random one from the center of the pile then searched on a random number from the center of the bill and it was that Maritime Academy one that you guys already posted!
Permalink Practical Economist 
July 9th, 2007 10:54pm
"They don't want their real names showing up in this thread anymore than the rest of us do"

The news people will come up with every name by the end of the day.  I gurantee it.

I hope the blogs work that fast.
Permalink Bot Berlin 
July 9th, 2007 10:54pm
ES Snyder
(301) 724-1615
1004 Piedmont Ave,  Cumberland, MD 21502

Some poor random guy. Sucks that assholes like me are posting his number on the internet.
Permalink Practical Economist 
July 9th, 2007 10:55pm
PE, how long would it take for you to cook up a google crawler that would read the numbers from a text file and then output them some csv file.
Permalink Bot Berlin 
July 9th, 2007 10:56pm
Diane Rashid, Century 21 agent
301-257-3622 Mobile
North Bethesda, MD

See I am providing a service for Mrs. Rashid, giving her something to question Mr. Rashid about.
Permalink Practical Economist 
July 9th, 2007 10:58pm
Don't be complaining about the politics of personal destruction next week.  People will lose their jobs.  Families will be broken.  Just because a puritanical religious strain of crazy still holds sway with a large section of the electorate, enabled by the base mass of humanity who see humor and sport in ruining lives.  You are the same pathetic lot who were "outraged" at Janet's wardrobe malfunction then pushed it to the top of youtube the very next day. 

You think the politics in your country are garbage?  You are getting exactly what you deserve.
Permalink Jane Galt 
July 9th, 2007 10:59pm
I'd have to OCR the files though. I have some OCR software somewhere, but some of the numbers are pretty indistinct and would have to be manually checked first.

It's more fun to hit a few random ones one by one. As was already said, the news media has probably got 1000 guys working on this right now anyway and they can do the whole list faster than I could.
Permalink Practical Economist 
July 9th, 2007 11:00pm
Important CoT Tip #7: do not use your wife's business cell phone to order up call girls.
Permalink Practical Economist 
July 9th, 2007 11:01pm
"You are the same pathetic lot who were "outraged" at Janet's wardrobe malfunction then pushed it to the top of youtube the very next day."

Wow, you don't know this crowd at all, do you?

On here, and on reddit, this is about hoping to stumble across the name of one of those hypocritical regligious nuts that did the complaining. A frightening number of the vocal moral minority seem to turn up in the company of prostitutes (male and female).

Finding Charlie Sheen's (or Bill Clinton's) name in there wouldn't be nearly as entertaining as finding Tony Snow's or Alberto Gonzales' (or Ashcroft's - w00t!)
Permalink Send private email Philo 
July 9th, 2007 11:03pm
"On here, and on reddit, this is about hoping to stumble across the name of one of those hypocritical regligious nuts that did the complaining."

Bullshit.  What's been posted so far are just ordinary people.  None of the names that Michael and PE are forever associating in the google cache with prositution are "regligious nuts" as far as we know.

It's about hurting people for amusement.

*You* don't know this crowd very well.
Permalink Jane Galt 
July 9th, 2007 11:07pm
Oh man, this is going to be a fun week.

http://atrios.blogspot.com/2007_07_08_archive.html#250268679654275783
Permalink Bot Berlin 
July 9th, 2007 11:14pm
premature apology.  there will be a bunch of those.


I would feel bad about enjoying this, but the only people publicly apologising are going to be people who have cheated on their wives or lied to their congregation.

heh.  it _Really_ is going to be a fun week.

shame dick has had his name removed already.
Permalink Send private email zestyZucchini 
July 9th, 2007 11:17pm
Yeah that could be true if we were the only people in the world with this data and we were releasing it.

But we're not. The information is out there and we are here working as journalists to research this information. It would breech our journalistic ethics to ignore this story just because we're concerned about embarrassing people who may possibly be involved in criminal behavior.
Permalink Practical Economist 
July 9th, 2007 11:27pm
(that was to Ms Galt)
Permalink Practical Economist 
July 9th, 2007 11:27pm
Don't stress it PE, reddit is on top of it.

http://reddit.com/info/24wgi/comments

I am just curious how long it will take and what website comes up with the info.
Permalink Bot Berlin 
July 9th, 2007 11:30pm
Hopefully in the next couple of hours.
Permalink Bot Berlin 
July 9th, 2007 11:30pm
Oh man, they have already bit-torrented the data.

http://www.mininova.org/tor/786196
Permalink Bot Berlin 
July 9th, 2007 11:32pm
Sen. David Vitter's confession there kind of bothers me in how he tries to drag 'god' into a discussion of his seeing call girls while married to his wife. Why do those evangelicals always do that? I think they are hoping to distract attention away from their actions by trying to make it about religion. It seems really inappropriate to me.

"I am sorry that I murdered your family, but let me tell you that jesus has forgiven me and beyond that I have nothing to say."

That's not much of an apology in my opinion.

I would prefer he said, "My number is on the call girl list because I used to get lots and lots of hookers. I also did a lot of coke. Actually I still do the coke, though I've given up on the hookers ever since my wife caught me and threatened to divorce me. I guess you think it's hypocritical of me since as a senator I release lots of moralistic statements about my religion and criticizing others, and you know, you are right, I am not just a hypocrite, but a total phony and yet I fooled all of you just by yelling 'jesus is my savior' at several campaign stops. Suckers."

Now, THAT would have been honest.
Permalink Practical Economist 
July 9th, 2007 11:33pm
Not my problem, but in a way it's as one with the "no-fly" and "no-vote" lists.
Permalink trollop 
July 9th, 2007 11:36pm
>> Just because a puritanical religious strain of crazy still holds sway with a large section of the electorate, enabled by the base mass of humanity who see humor and sport in ruining lives. <<

It's not the public's job to keep a lid on the lies someone tells their spouse.  An honest person has little to fear.
Permalink Michael B 
July 10th, 2007 12:45am
I'd just like to say I am embarrassed and ashamed of my weakness. I apologize in front of the world, my family, and my God and I ask forgiveness for I am truly repentant. I went through a 2 minute inner nature retraining course and I have come out it a changed man. My dark side has been filled with the love of the lord and the support of my family during these trying times. I look forward to picking up where I left off and continuing to serve my country.
Permalink The Guilty 
July 10th, 2007 1:33am
You're still on the "NoSex4U" list.

And get back in the kennel.
Permalink Your Spouse 
July 10th, 2007 4:47am
like it matters ... where's my mobile?
Permalink The Guilty 
July 10th, 2007 4:56am
TG, you need to enter rehab and also claim you have a sex addiction that you blame on a bad childhood.
Permalink Full name 
July 10th, 2007 12:45pm
SELECT *
WHERE (ClientName LIKE '%Kennedy%')
Permalink xampl 
July 10th, 2007 1:20pm

This topic is archived. No further replies will be accepted.

Other topics: July, 2007 Other topics: July, 2007 Recent topics Recent topics