Nobody likes to be called a dummy by a dummy.

Is Britney batshit crazy? Lifeless CoT'ters want to know!

Britney's latest impersonations of a crazy person:

"During the shoot, the 25-year-old mother-of-two was said to be "completely out of it", and the resulting pictures are "so bad" that publishing them could "kill her career".

At one stage Britney's eyes allegedly rolled back in her head and she was said to have looked "half dead".

Her mood was described as extremely erratic, with one source revealing she took frequent bathroom breaks and each time she returned her mood had changed.

She was also allegedly severely paranoid during the entire interview, and at one point she believed the ceiling was about to cave in.

During the shoot, Britney ordered fried chicken, and when she had finished eating it she reportedly wiped her hands on a Gucci dress worth several thousand dollars, staining it with grease."

http://www.news24.com/News24/Entertainment/Celebrities/0,,2-1225-2108_2152637,00.html
Permalink Bluebeard 
July 25th, 2007 8:12am
Because we don't have a word for schadenfreude I'm not enjoying watching her auger into the ground.
Permalink Send private email Philo 
July 25th, 2007 9:23am
poor bitch. that's some sad shit going on right there.
Permalink $-- 
July 25th, 2007 9:23am
"Because we don't have a word for schadenfreude"

We do now.
Permalink AMerrickanGirl 
July 25th, 2007 10:00am
That article seems like a load of BS.
Cleaning up dog shit with a channel dress?  Why would a rich spoiled brat clean up dog shit?  She would just ignore it and let someone else do it.
Permalink LH 
July 25th, 2007 10:09am
>But now magazine executives are deciding whether to go ahead with the exclusive as it happened or protect the pop star with a heavily edited version.

Geee, I wonder what they're going to do...hrmmm...

"Oh man! We can DESTROY her with this stuff, selling a boatload of magazines in the process KICK ASS! Call up all the gossip relays and tell them that we're morally conflicted about whether to protect her, or to feed her to wolves. Sales are going to be awesome when we dish the dirt!"

I listen to an "Adult top 40" station in the morning, and occasionally they do their entertainment reports. Hearing them soberly relay the nonsense about the magazine contemplating whether to protect Britney amazes me. How gullible.
Permalink DF 
July 25th, 2007 10:15am
I don't think it's BS. Britney really is messed up. I do feel bad for her because she has tried to be a decent person in the past and her handlers have driven her into madness. Remember when she married her high school sweetheart, and they had a meeting and decided this would not do, she needed an annulment and if she was going to get married it needed to be to someone edgier, in order to further her career? Well she listened to them and she should not have.
Permalink Practical Economist 
July 25th, 2007 12:08pm
"Handlers" belong on the Golgafrincham B Ark, with record executives, movie producers, and the RIAA.
Permalink Send private email Philo 
July 25th, 2007 12:12pm
Yes. Britney's got some real choreography and dancing skills so I respect her as an artist there. But the handlers would be best sent on that B ark.
Permalink Practical Economist 
July 25th, 2007 12:35pm
Here's a MUCH better writeup:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19956262/

See, without handlers Britney never would've been told she was a pop icon and she could've had a happy life as a backup dancer for Christina Aguilera.
Permalink Send private email Philo 
July 25th, 2007 1:09pm

This topic is archived. No further replies will be accepted.

Other topics: July, 2007 Other topics: July, 2007 Recent topics Recent topics