...but those involving kings and empires?

Taken from: http://reason.com/blog/show/121522.html

I just read an article not long ago that confirmed the existence of some king mentioned in the bible. 

I don't think it's a completely accurate history but I also don't believe you can simply discount the historical content as merely fiction.

(This doesn't seem terribly controversial)

REPOST DILDO! 

From earlier today.  It's even got the same fucking title!

Bah, I did a quick scan and missed it.

I'll delete.

sorry wayne, Im _really_ not meaning to be contrary but nobody else gets to edit their posts after the fact....

It's spew, then.  Too many repeated posts on the same topic.

AND people do get to have their own posts removed, if there's a good reason, by requesting a moderator do it.

Don't be a twit.

since when? and since when is being a repost dildo considered a good reason?  and since when is 2 posts on the same topic considered to be 'spew'?  and since when do you have the raw courage to call me a 'twit'?


answers to this and many, many less interesting questions right after this post from ward...

I agree that mods should have the same rights and priveleges of embarrassment.