http://slate.msn.com/id/2109145/

Makes you think that Kerry voters don't have vision.

You mean "marketing wins over substance" or "sell the sizzle not the steak."

Kerry just wasn't good looking enough -- it's the kind of crap that people care about.

Oh, and he also couldn't put together a sentence shorter than a thousand words.

"Vision without details beats details without vision."

I think I read something similar to this recently.

But I can't remember what it was.

Thanks for stating the obvious.

---" "Vision without details beats details without vision.""----

"bullshit beats fact" might be more appropriate. That said, Kerry came over so wooden he would be a shoo-in for the remake of "The Wizard of Oz".

Why Bush won:
Kerry has a 30+ year record of saying one thing, then doing another. Bush's record is only half that long.

Kerry supporters/Bush haters: Please, _please_, seek professional help to get you over the delusion that Kerry would be doing anything different with regards to foreign policy in Iraq right now. The only thing that would have changed is that Mr. Chirac would have had his knob slobbed several times by Teresa Heinz on the recent presidential visit to Europe.

At least Kerry does not have the neo-cons who want to increase US influnce in the world at all costs.

No, Kerry's problem would be the UN forcing their influence on the US (remeber the ol' "Global Test"). Forget about electing a cabinet, Kerry would be on constant call with Chirac, Schroeder & Annan on how to run everything. Got a problem with social security, apply the global test. Got a problem with homeland security, apply the global test. Gotta a problem with those pesky conservatives, apply the global test.

Bush supporters/Kerry haters: Please, _please_ learn how to win gracefully.