Huh? Andrew Sullivan math error?
530,000 * 10 = 5,300,000 = 70,000,000 ?
===============
WHAT IF MENCKEN BLOGGED? Jack Shafer wonders whether it's true that H. L. Mencken actually produced 70 million words in his lifetime. He reckons it's more in the 5 million range. But what if he'd been a blogger, as I suspect he would be if he were alive today? I just counted up the words typed into this blog over 2005. I say "typed" because a chunk of them are quotes or emails from readers and the like. Nevertheless, at 530,000 words a year, a blogger could match Mencken's lifetime record in a decade. Six years and counting ...
====================
http://www.andrewsullivan.com/index.php?dish_inc=archives/2006_01_01_dish_archive.html#113630426610054309
January 3rd, 2006
I think he means if the lifetime record were 5 million
>He reckons it's more in the 5 million range.
Ummm, the math works out if you assume that what he reckons is correct.
-
January 3rd, 2006
Nevermind. Cory beat me to it...
-
January 3rd, 2006
Oh, I get it. So there is a guess that Mencken wrote 70 million words. Shaffer says, nahhh, couldn't be more then 5 million. And Sullivan comes along and says, WAIT, if he were a blogger, well, THEN it could be 5 million. Well, great Sullivan, that's exactly what Shaffer got WITHOUT blogging.
I suspect Sullivan has mixed up the 5 and the 70.
January 3rd, 2006
I think this is the key line:
"He reckons it's more in the 5 million range."
KC
January 3rd, 2006
Oh, so a decade instead of a lifetime. OK. Makes sense.
January 3rd, 2006