Anything else just isn't Enterprise enough.

I'm starting to hate bitcoin

and its ilk. The algorithm approaches genius in its nonobvious but clever solution to a perceived problem, not unlike the invention of the automatic transmission which uses braking(!) to effect the changing of gears, but the sheer amount of energy expended in the production of literally nothing is starting to annoy me.
Permalink , Cup 
August 7th, 2017 7:50pm
Yes, this one of my complaints about it too. Gold doesn't require constant expenditure of energy to store value.
Permalink Yoda 
August 7th, 2017 7:57pm
So one could say that once the externalised cost is internalised, the value of bitcoin has a friction or drag that gold does not.
Permalink , Cup 
August 7th, 2017 9:07pm
The so-called "value of bitcoin" is based on nothing.  Nothing more than what it's originator claims it has.  Since it's not backed by anything, its value can swing widely, as it's based purely on speculation.
Permalink SaveTheHubble 
August 7th, 2017 9:10pm
Bitcoin also has a severe design flaw.  Every once in awhile, the reward for mining is halved, eventually going to zero.

That means, after awhile, there's almost no incentive for miners to maintain the network, just transaction fees.

It also isn't anonymous.  There's a public record of all transactions.  When police start linking addresses to people, they can break anonymity.
Permalink FSK 
August 7th, 2017 9:37pm
The "value of bitcoin" has an upper bound, the cost of mining.  However, it has no lower bound.
Permalink FSK 
August 7th, 2017 9:38pm
An EMP would "delete" Bitcoin. The run up in price is fascinating, but it's way to crazy to consider now.
Permalink Send private email Bored Bystander 
August 7th, 2017 9:58pm
"Gold doesn't require constant expenditure of energy to store value."

It does require a huge amount of energy to extract, I wouldn't be surprised to find it's worse than bitcoin.
Permalink libtard_uk 
August 8th, 2017 3:51am
"It does require a huge amount of energy to extract, I wouldn't be surprised to find it's worse than bitcoin."

http://www.visualcapitalist.com/what-is-the-cost-of-mining-gold/
Permalink Yoda 
August 8th, 2017 9:50am
"Since it's not backed by anything, its value can swing widely, as it's based purely on speculation."

Just like modern fiat currency then?
Permalink Bluebeard 
August 8th, 2017 4:24pm
>It does require a huge amount of energy to extract, I wouldn't be surprised to find it's worse than bitcoin.

It's also incredibly damaging to the environment. IIRC they use cyanide to leach the metal out of rocks.

All to put it back underground again.
Permalink Shylock 
August 10th, 2017 9:37pm

This topic is archived. No further replies will be accepted.

Other topics: August, 2017 Other topics: August, 2017 Recent topics Recent topics