Just shoot the fuckers
Who the fuck grants interview to the DM?
You'd think it would save time to grant the interview to someone more ethical and wait for the DM to plagiarise it verbatim.
To be fair, he has a point.
There are too many jihadists and jihadi sympathesizers in the UK to monitor them all without turning the country into a stasi like police state. So if they all want to fuck off to the Middle East and we get to bomb them from 30,000 feet, I'm fine with that.
Wasn't there some research that showed most of them were coming back disenchanted with what the encountered, perhaps they could be used to discourage others from joining up. Probably to pragmatic for the press and politicians though.
There's like 30,000 at least of them here.
You'd need a 1 million strong security force to monitor them 24x7.
If 2000 come back from Syria, and even if 75% are disenchanted *forever* with extremism (which I doubt, they often move to other extremist organisations), there are still 500 bad guys.
- You'd need like 15,000 police to watch the 500 even if you had infallible means of detecting which of the 2000 are the 500.
- If you don't know which are the bad guys, you'd need 60,000 police.
The idiots die out there, clearing mines with their feet.
The ones that make it back...
Know how to use guns
Know how to build bombs
Have made useful connections
Hate the West even more than before
Like to rape, torture and kill
Letting them come back is insane.
In NL people that fought for a foreign army can be stripped of their nationality. In some cases this is used to deny them their re-entrance in NL.
It is not being done on a large scale though.
The number of Dutch Jihadi's is much smaller than the British but they are regarded as a very large risk by intelligence services.
Unfortunately many Dutch judges regard them as poor misled people and are lenient as if they were just a naughty boy or girl. Among Dutch judges left-liberal women are in the majority for whom culprits are victims of society.
December 7th, 2017 6:05am
>There's like 30,000 at least of them here.
Well more like 800 and half have already returned.
The figure is 20,000 - 25,000 are 'of concern'
3,000 are a 'direct threat'
These are Islamist extremists in the UK overall, not necessarily returning jihadis.
The current figure for jihadists returned to the UK is 425.
> The figure is 20,000 - 25,000 are 'of concern'
And Salman Abedi, the Manchester suicide bomber, was in the category *below* that (and there was a meeting scheduled for later that week on whether to upgrade him to 'of concern' based in some potentially suspicious actions).
And also in the lower category, was Khalid Masood, the Westminster Bridge attacker. As far as I know, there was nothing he had done to trigger moving him into the 'of concern' category.
So the reality is the 25,000 that are 'of concern' are simply those of the *most* concern. And there's a lot more that should be of concern.
>And there's a lot more that should be of concern.
40% of UK Muslims support Sharia law.
Which is about 3 million people
Trying to drive IS out of Syria by sending more British and American troops is exactly the same strategy as trying to drive cholera out of Haiti by sending more Nepalese UN peacekeepers.
Interesting, I 'remembered ' this as Bangladeshis, but I googled it and it was indeed Nepalese.
Why do we want to drive them out of Syria?
Encourage them ALL to go to Syria. Offer free flights. Everybody who wants to live in the caliphate can go!
Then send over the B-52s
> Then send over the B-52s
Let’s just Bomb the Muslim parts of London now!
And have them play "Rock-Lobster" and "The Love Shack".
I love those songs.
December 7th, 2017 8:33pm