Sanding our assholes with 150 grit.

Hat-trick

None for 3 in the first. Too bad the advantage was squandered. But truly a first class match. Three cheers to the Pathan.
Permalink Send private email KayJay 
January 30th, 2006 1:41am
I LIKE TO MOVE IT MOVE IT!
I LIKE TO MOVE IT MOVE IT!
I LIKE TO MOVE IT MOVE IT!

MOVE IT!
Permalink Blah 
January 30th, 2006 1:42am
"Pathan wikipedia": fast bowler in indian cricket team who got a hatrick by bowling out three batsmen continuously in his first over!!!. In test cricket, it is a big achievement. 3 Kudos! to pathan
Permalink hitchhicker 
January 30th, 2006 1:48am
I LIKE TO MOVE IT MOVE IT!
I LIKE TO MOVE IT MOVE IT!
I LIKE TO MOVE IT MOVE IT!

MOVE IT!
Permalink Send private email Dennis Forbes 
January 30th, 2006 1:51am
I LIKE TO MOVE IT MOVE IT!
I LIKE TO MOVE IT MOVE IT!
I LIKE TO MOVE IT MOVE IT!

MOVE IT!
Permalink Hat Trick 
January 30th, 2006 2:21am
I don't get it.
Permalink Send private email Flasher T 
January 30th, 2006 2:33am
He's talking about the English game of cricket.
An Indian bowler Irfan Pathan took a hatrick against Pakistan - something like 3 successive batsmen out in baseball ( eq. of 9 successive strikes), except that you need just 1 strike in cricket to dismiss a batsman (or 3 strikes in all).

It's the 36th time something has happened like that in cricket. The only thing that's interesting about this one is that the opposition (Pakistan) hadnt scored at all before the batsmen were dismissed (I think that's a first).
Permalink Send private email Vineet Reynolds 
January 30th, 2006 2:54am
I don't mean that (although I in fact don't get cricket, and equally don't get baseball). I mean the MOVE IT bit.
Permalink Send private email Flasher T 
January 30th, 2006 3:03am
That's what happens when you get a partial clone of muppet.
Permalink Send private email Vineet Reynolds 
January 30th, 2006 3:06am
Some people from across the water get a little stressed at threads which mention the game. 

I suspect it's because if they ask qustions we attempt to explain the rules which can take on a "Mornington Crescent" quality due to the jargon level...
Permalink Send private email a cynic writes 
January 30th, 2006 5:43am
actually its entirely because its so incredibly boring.
Permalink Send private email FullNameRequired 
January 30th, 2006 5:50am
It may correlate with a short span of attention.
Permalink Send private email Simon Lucy 
January 30th, 2006 5:51am
my short span of attention correlates with incredibly dull activities.
Permalink Send private email FullNameRequired 
January 30th, 2006 6:06am
....a nice example of this is just the other day.  I was once watching this lizard thing at a zoo.  it didn't move.  apparently it sometimes doesn't move for years.  I watched it for nearly 2 hours. it didn't move.

it compares favourably with cricket.
Permalink Send private email FullNameRequired 
January 30th, 2006 6:09am
" I was once watching this lizard thing at a zoo.  it didn't move.  apparently it sometimes doesn't move for years.  I watched it for nearly 2 hours. it didn't move.

it compares favourably with cricket."

Sidebar!
Permalink Send private email Flasher T 
January 30th, 2006 6:20am
What are your thoughts on American Football?

Granted it doesn't last quite as long as even a local cricket  match but it is similarly episodic.
Permalink Send private email a cynic writes 
January 30th, 2006 7:30am

This topic is archived. No further replies will be accepted.

Other topics: January, 2006 Other topics: January, 2006 Recent topics Recent topics